MicroStrategy, Inc. v. Lauricia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant had not waived right to arbitrate because plaintiff failed to “carry her ‘heavy burden’ of No. 76-1
• explaining that “the dispositive question is whether the party objecting to arbitration has suffered actual prejudice.”
• determining that employer’s trade-secret claims in state court did not constitute a waiver of binding arbitration related to an employment dispute
• finding that the moving party did not waive the right to arbitration even though litigation of the prior claims involved many motions, responses, depositions and other procedural maneuvers
• noting \this principle of `default' [in the FAA] is akin to waiver\ (internal quotations omitted)
• rejecting defendant’s speculation that discovery would not be available in arbitration because her contention was not grounded in evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).