· 10/3/2013
Microsoft Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Citations
- 731 F.3d 1354
- 108 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1443
- 35 Int'l Env't Rep. (BNA) 2081
- 2013 WL 5479876
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that where a term, like “state,” is especially “general on its facet,] ... it begs for clarification from the specification”
- “A company seeking section 337 protection must therefore provide evidence that its substantial domestic in- vestment . . . relates to an actual article that practices the patent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Prost, Taranto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.