· 3/13/2001
Microsoft Corp. v. Action Software
Citations
- 136 F. Supp. 2d 735
- 58 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1305
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7275
- 2001 WL 301183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing Harco Corp. v. Corrpro Cos., Inc., No. 1465, 1986 WL 12338 (Ohio Ct.App. Oct. 29, 1986)
- because an injunction against copyright infringement is authorized by statute, plaintiff need only show a strong likelihood of success on the merits to procure an injunction in a copyright case
- “Ohio is one of the first states to recognize that lawsuits implemented with the design to gain an unfair advantage over a competing business are a basis for a common law suit for unfair competition”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Malley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.