Skip to main content
· 3/13/2001

Microsoft Corp. v. Action Software

Citations

  • 136 F. Supp. 2d 735
  • 58 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1305
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7275
  • 2001 WL 301183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Harco Corp. v. Corrpro Cos., Inc., No. 1465, 1986 WL 12338 (Ohio Ct.App. Oct. 29, 1986)
  • because an injunction against copyright infringement is authorized by statute, plaintiff need only show a strong likelihood of success on the merits to procure an injunction in a copyright case
  • “Ohio is one of the first states to recognize that lawsuits implemented with the design to gain an unfair advantage over a competing business are a basis for a common law suit for unfair competition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.