Microdecisions, Inc. v. Skinner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “the fact that a person seeking access to public records wishes to use them in a commercial enterprise does not alter his or her rights under Florida’s public records law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-02-05· cited 58×
• Chandler v. City of Greenacres
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-11· cited 9×
• Seago v. Horry County
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-06-16· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-18· cited 905×
• Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1998-02-24· cited 895×
• Montgomery v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-15· cited 55×
• Building Officials & Code Adm. v. Code Technology, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1980-08-27· cited 30×
• News-Press Publishing Co., Inc. v. Gadd
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-09-05· cited 14×
• State ex rel. Davis v. McMillan
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1905-01-15· cited 11×
• STATE, DHRS v. Southpointe Pharmacy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-13· cited 9×
• Bevan v. Wanicka
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-22· cited 6×
• Royal Netherlands Realty, Inc. v. Ross
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-26· cited 5×
• In Re Report and Recommendations of Jud. Mgmt. Council on Ct. Records
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-11-07· cited 4×
• WFTV, Inc. v. Robbins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-10-20· cited 3×
• Bridgham v. Skrzynski
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-14· cited 2×