Micro Motion Incorporated v. Exac Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor v. Smith Meter, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that an order denying a motion to quash, or an order compelling testimony or production of documents is not final and, hence, is not appealable regardless of how the matter is raised.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).