Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 1/14/2004

Mickens-Thomas v. Vaughn

Citations

  • 355 F.3d 294
  • 2004 WL 61018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing the district court’s legal decision de novo because that court had not held a hearing or made factual findings
  • reviewing the district court's legal decision de novo because that court had not held a hearing or made factual findings
  • noting previous reluctance to intrude on Board’s discretionary powers, but doing so where facts suggested, inter alia, “bad faith” or an “inference of retaliation or vindictiveness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Solviter, McKee, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.