Mickelsen v. Albertson's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the plaintiff asserted that she could no longer engage in the recreational activities of running and bicycling, she cites to no evidence that she was severely restricted from doing any activities of central importance in most people’s lives
• holding that although the plaintiff asserted that she could no longer engage in the recreational activities of running and bicycling, she cites to no evidence that she was severely restricted from doing any activities of central importance in most people’s lives
• holding that although the plaintiff asserted that she could no longer engage in the recreational activities of running and bicycling, she cites to no evidence that she was severely restricted from doing any activities of central importance in most people = s lives
• declining to consider evidence that was conclusory, 19 speculative, and lacked foundation establishing personal knowledge at summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).