Mick v. Mani

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if plaintiff presented entire damage claim in one action and sued defendant in subsequent action for same damages, “[w]hen ... [the first] verdict became final, plaintiffs entire damage claim was ended”
• Although the determination of contribution should be made in original action, plaintiff may pursue separate actions against joined tortfeasors where there has been no judicial determination of comparative fault. It is more accurately described as one-trial rule, instead of one-action rule.
• Although the determination of contribution should be made in original action, plaintiff may pursue separate actions against joined tortfeasors where there has been no judicial determination of comparative fault. It is more accurately described as one-trial rule, instead of one-action rule.
• discussing purposes of comparative negligence statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).