Micilcavage v. Connelie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the regulation in question was unconstitutionally broad where it proscribed all speech, not only that dealing with official business or functions, and thus, attempted to restrict speech based solely on its content
• invalidating a, regulation requiring members of the New York state police to obtain the authorization of the superintendent before delivering a public address or speech

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).