Michigan Pork Producers Ass'n v. Veneman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[e]ven assuming that the advertising funded by the [Pork] Act is indeed commercial speech, the more lenient standard of review applied to limits on commercial speech has never been applied to speech— commercial or otherwise — that is compelled”
• “We conclude that the pork indus- try’s extensive control over the Pork Act’s promotional activi- ties prevents their attribution to the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).