Michigan Milk Producers Ass'n v. Department of Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this Court’s review is limited to whether the tribunal committed an error of law or adopted the wrong legal principle
• which applied a former version of the agricultural-production exemption, MCL 205.94(l)(f), and concluded that “concurrent taxable use with an exempt use does not remove the protection of exemption”
• which applied a former version of the agricultural-production exemption, MCL 205.94(1)(f), and concluded that “concurrent taxable use with an exempt use does not remove the protection of exemption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).