Skip to main content
· 5/25/1989

Michigan Department of Education v. United States Department of Education, Lauro Cavazos, Secretary

Citations

  • 875 F.2d 1196
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that criticism of expert analysis might be cured with further stratification of sample
  • random, stratified sample of .4 percent (259 out of a universe of 66,368) used as a starting point for determining improper expenditures
  • “[W]hen, as here, the state is given every opportunity to challenge each disallowance as well as the audit technique itself, it appears that the state has been treated as fairly as is practicable under the circumstances.”
  • random sampling and statistical methods of 15 extrapolating the sample results to a large universe of claims may serve as evidence of 16 whether the claims complied with statutory limitations on federal payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Norris, Ballantine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.