Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that “the substance” of a borrower’s request “must pertain specifically to servicing [to] trigger an obligation to respond under RESPA”
• dismissing RESPA claim “[g]iven the [b]ank’s response to an overly broad information request”
• “Plaintiffs fail to assert any right to relief under the Massachusetts debt collection statute as § 49 itself provides no private right of action.”
• “When a non-client asserts a chapter 93A claim against an attorney, the attorney must have been acting in a business context vis-a-vis plaintiffs.”
• “A synthesis of the existing cases that address the question suggests that an eviction action can implicate the FDCPA, particularly where the eviction action includes some demand for payment tied to the property at issue.”
• Section “49 itself provides no private right of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).