Michigan Catholic Conference & Catholic Family Services v. Burwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the “trigger” argument because “it is federal law that requires the insurance issuer or the third-party administrator to provide this coverage”
• finding no factual basis to determine the government will need to make any determination as to which entities are exempt; therefore no excessive entanglement has been shown
• “Submitting the self-certification form to the insurance issuer or third-party administrator does not ‘trigger’ contraceptive coverage; it is federal law that requires the insurance issuer or the third-party administrator to provide this coverage.”
• the government's imposition of an independent obligation on a third party does Nos. 14-1430 & 14-1431 37 not impose a substantial burden on an objector’s exercise of religion
• the government's imposition of an independent obligation on a third party does Nos. 14-1430 & 14-1431 37 not impose a substantial burden on an objector’s exercise of religion
• the government's imposition of an independent obligation on a third party does Nos. 14-1430 & 14-1431 37 not impose a substantial burden on an objector’s exercise of religion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).