Michelson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no constitutional prohibition against remand for conviction of a lesser included offense when the jury specifically has found the existence of all elements of the offense and where the error causing remand does not disturb those findings
• “[W]e find no constitutional prohibition against remand for conviction for a lesser degree or lesser included offense where the jury has specifically found the existence of all elements of the offense and where the error causing remand does not disturb those findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-29· cited 7×
• State v. Wells
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-12· cited 4×
• Hernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-06· cited 1×
• Wallace v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-17
• ISAAC M. DILVER, JR. v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-11-16

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Chapman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-23· cited 52×
• State v. Gale Distributors, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-03-24· cited 51×
• Capital City Country Club v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-04· cited 42×
• Goss v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-20· cited 24×
• Henry v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-12-15· cited 20×
• Sigler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 16×
• Michelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 12×
• Sigler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-14· cited 7×
• Wallace v. PL DODGE MEMORIAL HOSP.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-02· cited 4×