· 10/27/1994
Michelson v. Hamada
Citations
- 29 Cal. App. 4th 1566
- 36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 343
- 29 Cal. App. 2d 1566
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 15182
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8226
- 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1090
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]he existence of an agency is a factual question within the province of the trier of fact whose determination may not be disturbed on appeal if supported by substantial evidence”
- “[Punitive] awards generally are not allowed to exceed 10 percent of the net worth of the defendant.”
- “An agent is a fiduciary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.