Michelsen v. Patterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, on a motion for summary judgment relating to the definition of a relevant market, the court must ask \whether there is sufficient evidence on which a trier of fact could adopt plaintiff's market definition\
• providing the plaintiff “waived any argument that his prior 2 work is best characterized as a composite job” because his counsel failed to raise this issue at the 3 administrative level
• “[W]here plaintiffs have not cited an evidentiary basis to contest a factually supported statement by [defendants], the Court has taken that statement as established.”
• “To survive a summary judgment motion, plaintiffs must establish a genuine issue of fact by citing to particular parts of materials in the record.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recounting DOJ claims in United States v. ASCAP, 13-CV-95 (S.D.N.Y.1941)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).