California Court of Appeal· 12/14/1965
Michelman v. Frye
Citations
- 238 Cal. App. 2d 698
- 48 Cal. Rptr. 142
- 1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding debtor’s declaration of homestead made while she was absent from the property due to threats of violence made by her husband who continued to reside there
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lillie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-10-02· cited 125×
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-05-11· cited 66×
- Diaz v. Kosmala (In Re Diaz)Ninth Circuit· 2016-03-11· cited 45×
- Hooks v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-06-25· cited 40×
- Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-01· cited 29×
- Keniston v. American National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-04-23· cited 21×
- Schroeter v. LowersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-04-01· cited 17×
- Warfield v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1973-06-19· cited 13×
- Brown v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-06-06· cited 8×
- Koret of California, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-10-27· cited 6×
- In Re: Michele McKee v. Karl AndersonNinth Circuit· 2024-01-17· cited 5×
- In Re RennerNinth Circuit· 1987-07-21· cited 3×
- Renner v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityNinth Circuit· 1987-07-21· cited 1×
- In re: Andy DiazNinth Circuit· 2016-03-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.