Michelle M. v. Dcs, H.N.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting college professor’s First Amendment claim for engaging in harassing speech and speech that was about “personal job-related matters”
• “[A] constitutional suit is not a way to enforce state law through the back door.”
• “[A] constitutional suit is not a way to enforce state law through the back door.”
• “[A] constitutional suit is not a way to enforce state law through the back door.”
• “[A] constitutional suit is not a way to enforce state law through the back door.”
• “[A] constitutional suit is not a way to enforce state law through the back door.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).