Skip to main content
· 6/11/2015

Michelle Ideker v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.

Citations

  • 788 F.3d 849
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9815
  • 2015 WL 3621382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that collateral estoppel applies when “the party against whom collateral estoppel is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in a prior suit”
  • noting the plaintiff cannot remedy her failure to appeal the district court’s dismissal by filing another suit based on the same claim
  • “In a diversity case like this, we apply state substantive law in deciding whether to apply collateral estoppel or issue preclusion . . . .”
  • no actual change in the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Loken, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.