Michell v. Swable

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that even if certain statements were erroneously admitted into evidence, the error was harmless where the sexual abuse victim’s testimony was unequivocal and supported by other evidence
• “[T]he - 15 - J-S41041-19 Commonwealth may not cross-examine a character witness about a defendant’s uncharged criminal allegations … or a defendant’s arrests that did not lead to convictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).