Skip to main content
· 2/14/2001

Michele Lacroix v. Sears, Roebuck,and Co.

Citations

  • 240 F.3d 688
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2131
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,484
  • 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 191
  • 2001 WL 139003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding employees from different departments with different positions are not similarly situated in all relevant respects
  • noting that conclusory or general statements in affidavits and depositions do not defeat properly supported summary judgment motion
  • mediocre performance review and memorandum of deficiency did not constitute adverse employment actions
  • comparator in different department in a different position not similarly situated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Magill, Battey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.