Skip to main content
· 4/29/1976

Michel v. ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Citations

  • 549 P.2d 519
  • 274 Or. 795
  • 1976 Ore. LEXIS 928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the question of ratification is ordinarily a question of fact”
  • determining on de novo review, in a suit for specific performance of a settlement agreement, whether the parties had entered into an enforceable settlement agreement
  • “in delaying its ‘disaffirmance’ for 20 days defendant did not do so within a reasonable time, in our judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tongue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.