Michel v. Hartford
Citations
- 226 Conn. App. 98
Syllabus
Pursuant to statute ((Rev. to 2019) § 31-51q), ''[a]ny employer . . . who subjects any employee to discipline or discharge on account of the exercise by such employee of rights guaranteed by the first amendment to the United States Constitution or section 3, 4 or 14 of article first of the Constitution of the state, provided such activity does not substantially or materially interfere with the employee's bona fide job performance or the working relationship between the employee and the employer, shall be liable to such employee for damages caused by such discipline or discharge . . . .'' The plaintiff appealed to this court from the judgment rendered for the defendant city on his claims for free speech retaliation under § 31-51q and the federal statute (42 U.S.C. § 1983). The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant's police department, reported to his commander that C, a fellow employee, had complained to him that he was being subjected to discriminatory treatment on the basis of his race. The commander ordered the plaintiff not to get involved and assured the plaintiff that he would take care of C's complaint. C subsequently told the plaintiff that the commander stated that he was unable to help with C's complaint. C, on the advice of the plaintiff, reported his complaint to the police union and to the department's internal affairs division and openly acknowledged that the plaintiff had suggested that he do so. C also filed a complaint with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) alleging that he was the subject of unlawful racial discrimina- tion. The plaintiff supported C's filing of the complaint and attempted to protect him from further discrimination and retaliation within the department. Subsequently, the plaintiff was, inter alia, removed from certain supervisory positions, removed from certain assignments that would result in the receipt of overtime compensation, and assigned to allegedly inconvenient shifts after he returned from paternity
Judges: Elgo; Prescott; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.