Skip to main content
· 4/7/1989

Michel v. Gard

Citations

  • 536 N.E.2d 1375
  • 181 Ill. App. 3d 630
  • 130 Ill. Dec. 164
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 435
  • 1989 WL 32019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissal affirmed in an action where a shareholder in a closely-held corporation sued the attorney hired to form the corporation for malpractice, in part, because it found no attorney-client relationship between the shareholder and the attorney hired by the incorporators
  • dismissal affirmed in an action where a shareholder in a closely-held corporation sued the attorney hired to form the corporation for malpractice, in part, because it found no attorney-client relationship between the shareholder and the attorney hired by the incorporators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spitz, McCullough, Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.