· 8/15/1832
Michel v. Bonecaze
Citations
- 4 La. 296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Court agrees with the County that 7 this exclusion is intended to address crimes or acts of willful dishonesty or fraud, none of which 8 are alleged here.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mathews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.