Michel & Pfeffer Iron Works, Inc. v. Ariston, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the district court admitted evidence of the defendant’s relationships with women who were not named in the indictment
• noting that the district court admitted evidence of the defendant’s relation- ships with women who were not named in the indictment
• indictment charged inducing two particular women into prostitution, so defendant could not be convicted of inducing prostitution generally
• indictment charged inducing two particular women into prostitution, so defendant could not be convicted of inducing prostitution generally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).