Skip to main content
· 12/27/1913

Michaelson v. Overmeyer

Citations

  • 77 Wash. 110
  • 137 P. 332
  • 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1901

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Notice—Statement of Pacts — Time for Piling. The time for taking an appeal or filing a statement of facts runs from the denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial, when made after judgment.</p> <p>Same — Statement of Pacts — Extension of Time — Notice. Under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 393, authorizing an order extending the time for filing a statement of facts, upon notice to the adverse party, an ex parte order extending the time is void; and it is immaterial that the extension was obtained by the official stenographer.</p> <p>Same — Statement of Pacts — Necessity. The necessity of a statement of facts is not obviated by 3 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1730-2, relating to abstracts on appeal.</p> <p>Same — Statement of Pacts — Extension'—Objections. It is not necessary to attack in the superior court a void order extending the time for filing a statement of facts entered without notice.</p>

Judges: Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.