Michaels Ex Rel. Estate of Michaels v. Mr. Heater, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Salzenstein’s testimony regarding defendant Mr. Heater’s failure to comply with voluntary industry standards is admissible, although certainly not conclusive evidence of negligence.”
• “[The witness] is an expert i[n] human factors engineering. Although he performed no studies or tests in conjunction with this case, the theories and methods upon which he relies are recognized by the engineering community.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).