Michaele Brown v. Laura Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FDA’s deeming authority did not violate the nondelegation doctrine
• “In the TCA, Congress delegated to the Secretary the power to ‘deem’ which tobacco products should be subject to the Act’s mandates.”
• “In the TCA, Congress delegated to the Secretary the power to ‘deem’ which tobacco products should be subject to the Act’s mandates.”
• “Obviously, the TCA’s purpose sounds in (1) protecting public health and (2) preventing young people from accessing (and becoming addicted to) tobacco products.”
• “[B]e- cause the plaintiffs haven’t stated a claim, they cannot show that the district court abused its discretion in denying them a preliminary injunction.”
• “The PMTA process is onerous, requiring manufacturers to gather significant amounts of information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).