Michael W. Boles and Daria F. Boles v. St. Marks Pond Industrial, LLC, f/k/a St. Marks Pond Borrow Pit, LLC, Daniel Hill, Gregory Jones, Florida Network, LLC d/b/a Berkshire Hathaway Homeservices Florida Network Realty, and Gulfstream Design Group, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even though there was room for differing opinions, the agency’s conclusion in favor of one opinion over another was not arbitrary and capricious
• stating that an agency decision is not arbitrary if room exists “for two opinions on a matter”
• deferring to the Commission’s denial of a variance under natural gas regulatory scheme based on the Commission’s technical knowledge and expertise
• applying arbitrary-or-capricious standard to decision by commission denying variance from rule governing annual reconciliation of natural-gas costs
• if the facts support two opinions on the matter, an agency’s decision is not arbitrary and capricious, “even though the court may believe that an erroneous conclusion was reached”
• “[A]n agency must generally conform to its prior norms and decisions or, to the extent that it departs from its prior norms and decisions, the agency must set forth a reasoned analysis for the departure that is not arbitrary and capricious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).