Michael Villasana v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence sufficient to support finding that defendant had remained unlawfully because he engaged in “the kind of ‘remaining’ which is likely to terrorize occupants”
• “trier may rely on its common sense, experience and knowledge of human nature in deciding among conflicting inferences that logically and reasonably flow from the same basic fact”
• “trier may rely on its common sense, experience and knowledge of human nature in deciding among conflicting inferences that logically and reasonably flow from the same basic fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).