Michael Tomlin, Individually, and d/b/a The Tomlin Company v. Nephrology Associates, P.C.

Syllabus

A renal care company retained a broker to locate sites for new dialysis clinics. The company agreed to pay the broker a commission when leases were signed and \at the renewal or extension of said leases.\ The company later negotiated amendments to the leases without the broker's participation. The broker sued the company for breach of contract, alleging that he was due a commission on the lease amendments. The trial court determined that eight lease amendments were renewals or extensions of the original leases. And it entered a judgment against the company for the amount of the unpaid commissions. We conclude that the evidence preponderates against the court's finding that two of the lease amendments were renewals or extensions. So we affirm the judgment as modified.