Michael Todd Brosius v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that close to fifty years after the decision, Burns “is still the leading authority”
• stating that close to fifty years after the decision, Burns “is still the leading authority”
• applying the deference standard that the court would have used in habeas review of a state court conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)
• \Hearsay may be considered in a suppression hearing in a federal court.\ (citing Raddatz , 447 U.S. at 679 , 100 S.Ct. 2406 )
• “Our court’s treatment of Burns has also been far from seamless.”
• \Hearsay may be considered in a suppression hearing in a federal court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).