Michael T. McGill v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The Court found that the trial court was not manifestly erroneous in denying mover’s rule for contempt, and finding 8 that the non-mover’s occasional failure to notify the mover of the child’s location was not a willful disobedience of the consent judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).