Michael Snow v. Directv, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “vague and conclusory allegations . . . are insufficient to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction”
• holding that the SCA does not apply to material that is readily available to the public
• holding that “vague and conclusory allegations” are “insufficient to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction . . ..”
• finding that plaintiff’s “vague and conclusory allegations” in the complaint were “insufficient to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction over [defendant]”
• noting that our duty to liberally construe a pro se plaintiff’s complaint does not include the duty to re-write it
• stating that “vague and conclusory allegations” need not be credited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).