Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/9/2020

Michael Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin

Citations

  • 952 F.3d 1051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “dismissal at the 18 pleading stage is by no means unprecedented” in copyright infringement cases
  • finding the district court did not abuse its “broad discretion” by permitting expert 18 to testify notwithstanding his alleged conflict of interest
  • noting 15 the access and substantial similarity prongs at this step are also referred to as “copying” 16 and “unlawful appropriation,” respectively
  • noting “dismissal at the 18 pleading stage is by no means unprecedented” in copyright infringement cases
  • substantial similarity may be decided as a matter of law by applying the extrinsic test
  • “To conclude otherwise would allow a 17 court to base a grant of summary judgment on a purely subjective determination of 18 similarity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Michael Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.