Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judges are absolutely immune from suit for any actions taken in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity
• holding that the issuance of an erroneous order barring a litigant from access to the court was an “integral part[] of the judicial process”
• finding that a clerk was performing an “integral part[ ] of the judicial process” even when executing an erroneous order
• finding that a clerk was performing an “integral part[] of the judicial process” even when executing an erroneous order
• finding that a clerk “instituting an erroneous order against [a] [p]laintiff barring his access to the court” was performing an “integral part[] of the judicial process”
• judicial immunity extends to auxiliary court personnel performing tasks that are integral to the judicial process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).