Skip to main content
· 9/2/2015

Michael Shelton v. United States

Citations

  • 800 F.3d 292
  • 2015 FED App. 0218P
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15573
  • 2015 WL 5131900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Day’s due process requirements at the Rule 4 screening stage; vacating judgment and remanding for further proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Suhrheinrich, Sutton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.