Michael Shane Read v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the relevant restitution order required “[l]ump sum payment . . . immediately” but provided that “[i]f restitution is not paid immediately, the defendant shall make payments” on a prescribed schedule
• stating this in a discussion of garnishment generally and not § 3664(n) in particular
• interpreting a judgment that included a payment schedule and specified that the amount owed was due in full immediately; holding that the payment schedule did not preclude garnishment as an additional means to collect the restitution judgment
• garnishment was proper where criminal judgment specified restitution was due in full on date of judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).