Michael Sellers v. Deere & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that federal anti-discrimination statutes require plaintiffs to file complaints with the EEOC before commencing a suit in federal court
• recognizing that federal anti-discrimination statutes 6 require plaintiffs to file complaints with the EEOC before commencing a suit in federal court
• holding that two incidents in four years of offensive conduct in which the plaintiff’s manager yelled at 16 him and acted violently did not support hostile work environment claim
• holding that in order to prevail on a hostile work environment claim, the plaintiff must present evidence that he is a member of the class of people protected by the statute
• noting that an administrative charge will be liberally construed for exhaustion purposes
• stating the “alleged adverse employment actions are discrete acts that should have been separately presented to the EEOC”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).