Michael Schaefer v. Mischelle Townsend, Registrar of Voters, County of Riverside Bill Jones, Secretary of State, State of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that case was not moot “without examining the future political intentions of the 39 Case: 16-16766 Date Filed: 08/29/2018 Page: 40 of 50 challenger[]”
• concluding that case was not moot \without examining the future political intentions of the challenger[ ]\
• concluding that case was not moot “without examining the future political intentions of the 39 Case: 16-16766 Date Filed: 08/29/2018 Page: 40 of 50 challenger[]”
• stating that capable-of-repetition prong 13 should not be narrowly construed to apply “only when a candidate plans to seek reelection” and 14 declining to “examin[e] the future political intentions of the challengers”
• asking whether state action has “the likely effect of handicapping an otherwise qualified class of candidates”
• finding unconstitutional a state statue requiring that its candidates be a registered voter requiring a minimum of 29 days residence in a voting precinct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).