Skip to main content
· 12/15/2006

Michael S. Thompson, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Doane Pet Care Co. Greg Dorin, Counter-Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 470 F.3d 1201
  • 67 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 202
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30824
  • 2006 WL 3682044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The rule contemplates that the expert will supplement, elaborate upon, explain and subject himself to cross-examination upon his report.”
  • “In the absence of an alternative accounting convention pertinent to the case, it may be assumed that certified public accountants base their calculations and opinions on the normal general standards of their profession, i.e., generally accepted accounting principles.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Sutton, Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.