Michael Roundtree v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] witness’s opinion as to the credibility, guilt or innocence of the accused is generally inadmissible . . . .”
• “[W]e find that the admission of the officer’s statements during the interrogation permitted the state to elicit a police officer’s opinion as to appellant’s guilt, thereby invading the province of the jury.”
• “[W]e 4 find that the admission of the officer’s statements during the interrogation permitted the state to elicit a police officer’s opinion as to appellant’s guilt, thereby invading the province of the jury.”
• “[A] police officer’s statements during an interrogation are admissible if they provoke a relevant response or provide context to the interview such that a rational jury could recognize the questions are interrogation techniques used to secure confessions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).