Skip to main content
· 10/14/2005

Michael Reese Hospital And Medical Center v. Tommy G. Thompson

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 436
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Ringer and holding that the exhaustion requirement applies to the request for relief under the federal mandamus statute
  • distinguishing Monmouth and holding that mandamus was not appropriate where HCFA rulings were issued prior to the intermediary determination, and plaintiff “complains merely that the intermediary did not properly apply the law in its determination”
  • “We need not consider whether this is such a ‘procedural’ claim, however, because Michael Reese cannot meet the standards for mandamus relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.