Michael Ray Ingram v. Marilyn J. Papalia and Chase Riveland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the Constitution does not create a property or liberty interest in prison employment” and that “Colorado law does not create a protected property or liberty interest to . . . employment in any particular job”
• stating that the Constitution does not create a property interest in prison job
• holding a prisoner has no constitutional right to a job in prison
• stating the Constitution does not create a property interest in prison employment
• “Colorado law does not create a protected property or liberty interest to either employment in any particular job or continued employment in any particular job.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).