· 1/22/1996
Michael R. STUBBLEFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WINDSOR CAPITAL GROUP; Michael Klingensmith, Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 74 F.3d 990
- 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 90
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 732
- 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,905
- 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1446
- 1996 WL 20871
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that since the appellant is “free to seek review of the district court’s decision [to grant a Rule 60(b) motion] after a final judgment is entered,” the grant is not “effec- tively unreviewable” and hence not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Baldock, Brorby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.