Skip to main content
· 1/22/1996

Michael R. STUBBLEFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WINDSOR CAPITAL GROUP; Michael Klingensmith, Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 74 F.3d 990
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 90
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 732
  • 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,905
  • 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1446
  • 1996 WL 20871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that since the appellant is “free to seek review of the district court’s decision [to grant a Rule 60(b) motion] after a final judgment is entered,” the grant is not “effec- tively unreviewable” and hence not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Baldock, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.