Michael P. Lewis v. David M. Fresne Lowell Farkas Robert A. Young Rosenfeld, Bernstein & Tannenhauser LLP Eric P. Rosenfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a single ' In their opposition, Plaintiffs cite facts not set forth in their Amended Complaint and unsupported by an affidavit. Plaintiffs may not amend their pleadings through their brief. See Wright v. Ernst & Young LLP, 152 F.3d 169, 178 (2d Cir. 1998
• finding personal jurisdiction in intentional tort claim when nonresident defendant was alleged to have participated in a telephone conference designed to convince plaintiff to make a loan, that the nonresident defendant sent loan documents containing fraudulent misstatements
• “[Plaintiff] contends that [Defendant] deliberately misled him . . . Therefore, the fiduciary shield doctrine should not apply.”
• “Leave to amend does not need to be granted when the amended complaint would not withstand a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).