Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of the participle \including\ in 11 U.S.C. § 707(a
• explaining that in a bench trial a motion for a directed verdict is resolved in accordance with Rule 52(c)
• explaining that the remedies for violations of Title VII and the ADA are both found in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(1) & (c)
• explaining that the remedies for violations of Title VII and the ADA are both found in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(1) & (c)
• “reviewing the [trial] court’s [motion for judgment on partial findings] order [by] evaluating the record as a whole”
• approving severance where “[t]he validity of the claims before us does not depend, as a matter of law, on the outcome of the severed claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).