Michael N. Corjasso, III v. Robert L. Ayers, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court's erroneous dismissal of a pro se petition justified equitable tolling
• holding that a district court’s improper dismissal—combined with the court’s loss of the original petition—was an “extraordinary circumstance” warranting equitable tolling
• explaining that the one-year statute of limitations under AEDPA 9 begins to run the day after the conviction becomes final
• explaining that the one-year statute of limitations under AEDPA begins to run 3 the day after the conviction becomes final
• explaining that the one-year statute of limitations 12 under AEDPA begins to run the day after the conviction becomes final
• holding that district court 10 erred in rejecting petition for filing because petitioner used cover sheet from another 11 judicial district, used white-out to cover up the name of that court, and wrote in pen the 12 name of the court where he filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).